[ad_1]
The UN nuclear watchdog agency said its inspectors refused to enter a nuclear facility in Karaj, but Tehran said it was not part of the agreement.
Tehran, Iran As part of efforts to restore the 2015 nuclear agreement, Iran and the global nuclear regulators diverged on the content of the understanding reached earlier this month.
Iran’s decision to restrict international inspections of its nuclear facilities in 2019 is part of a landmark agreement reached after the United States withdrew a year ago. However, it later allowed limited visits by inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
The International Atomic Energy Agency said on Sunday that its inspectors were denied entry to the centrifuge manufacturing plant in Karaj near the capital Tehran. After the United States withdrew from the agreement, Iran stepped up its nuclear activities.
The agency believes that Iran’s move runs counter to the joint statement reached by its director, Rafael Grossi, in Tehran on September 12 with Iran’s head of nuclear issues, Muhammad Eslamy. The agreement allows access to several unnamed locations so that the agency can replace the memory cards of its cameras and repair damaged devices.
The agency stated: “The Director-General reiterated that all the identified agency equipment and all activities of Iran’s facilities and locations mentioned in the joint statement are essential for maintaining the continuity of knowledge.”
However, the International Atomic Energy Agency stated that Iran has allowed access to all other locations subject to the agreement.
The Karaj nuclear power plant was sabotaged in June, which was the third such attack on Iranian nuclear facilities since mid-2020. Iran accused Israel of planning all these attacks.
Iranian criticism
In a series of tweets on Monday, Iran’s IAEA special envoy Kazem Gharibabadi criticized the agency for keeping silent on “terrorist” attacks, and did not even make a statement on the threat that the attacks pose to the country’s inspectors and equipment.
He also stated that the agreement earlier this month was for “identified equipment.” Iran informed the agency during discussions in Tehran and Vienna that equipment related to the Karaji site was not included because the site is still safe. And judicial investigation.
Gharibabadi said: “Any decision made by Iran regarding monitoring equipment is based solely on political rather than legal considerations, and the IAEA cannot and should not regard it as one of its rights.” He also stated that the agency’s latest report is “inaccurate” .
The agreement reached in Tehran avoided the possibility of a resolution on Iran at the agency’s board meeting earlier this month. Since Tehran has stated that it will not negotiate under “pressure” from the West, such a resolution may jeopardize the prospects of resuming Iran’s 2015 nuclear agreement.
The six rounds of negotiations in Vienna ended on July 20. The government of Iran’s new president, Ebrahim Raisi, said it is reviewing the negotiation records and will return to the negotiating table “soon”.
Raisy stated at the UN General Assembly last week that any negotiations to resume the agreement must lead to the lifting of US sanctions by former US President Donald Trump.
[ad_2]
Source link