Britain is increasingly disturbed by U.S. troop withdrawal from Afghanistan-News

The Boris Johnson administration believes that the U.S. decision to withdraw troops from Afghanistan was a “mistake” and that the international community may have to bear the consequences for this. Major members of the parliament (members) and experts have also joined the voice of criticism.

London has sent an additional 600 soldiers to help the staff of the British Embassy in Kabul, the capital of Afghanistan, return home.

British Defense Minister Ben Wallace criticized the United States’ withdrawal from Afghanistan. According to reports, the Taliban’s influence in Afghanistan is growing, while the chairman of the British (UK) Parliamentary Foreign Affairs Special Committee and former army officer Tom Tugendhat (Tom Tugendhat) Said that they accused Britain and the United States of “pulling the carpet” from the hands of the Afghan army. “Quit is not a sign of success. The need for reinforcements to keep the door open when you leave is definitely a sign of failure,” he said.

Wallace said that the withdrawal led by the United States has provided “motivation” for the Taliban. In an interview with Sky News, he warned that “the international community may bear the consequences” and expressed his concern that al Qaeda will re-establish a base in Afghanistan.

He said that the withdrawal agreement negotiated by the Donald Trump administration in Doha, Qatar, was a “bad agreement” that Britain had tried to resist. He added that Britain has no choice but to withdraw its troops because the international community must act together.

Wallace said: “When the United States made this decision as a framework country, the way we all configured meant that we had to leave. When Trump was dealing with the Taliban, I felt it was wrong to do so. All of us People, in the international community, may all pay for this.”

He added: “I speak bluntly in public. This is a very rare event for the US decision, but strategically speaking, it will cause many problems. As an international society, what we have seen Very difficult. Today.”

Wallace said: “The United States is leaving. We will leave with them. This left a very, very big problem in the development of the Taliban, obviously because of the momentum, which is not what we might want. After the announcement, I did. Tried to see if we can bring the international community together. I am afraid that most people in that community are not particularly interested.”

Rahul Roy-Chaudhury of the International Institute for Strategic Studies said, “Afghan security forces quickly surrendered to the Taliban in several provincial capitals. This is a huge impact on India. India is the only one who has not started. Participating regional countries. Only recently did they cooperate with the Taliban.”

He said: “However, the key to Afghanistan’s future lies in the Taliban’s seizure of Kabul, which is likely to trigger fierce competition. Nonetheless, Pakistan’s long-term close ties with the Taliban and the presence of anti-Indian terrorist organizations in Afghanistan, including Islamic religious organizations (LeT ) And the Muhammad Army (JeM), in New Delhi under the Taliban, Afghanistan once again became a refuge for terrorist organizations’ attacks on India.”

He added: “Although India can hardly change this reality diplomatically at present — it has too little contact with the Taliban and too late — it needs to continue to urge Afghanistan to ceasefire and end human rights violations by the Taliban.”