31 C
Dubai
Wednesday, November 20, 2024
spot_img

World News | Pollution not to blame for UK crab mass die-off, scientists say

[ad_1]

LONDON, Jan. 20 (AP) — British scientists said Friday they don’t think pollution has killed the thousands of crabs washing up on beaches in northeastern England, though they’re not sure what caused the unusual death.

In late 2021, the crustaceans were found dead or dying along more than 70 kilometers (44 miles) of coastline, some showing unusual “convulsions” in the throes of death.

Read also | Alphabet layoffs: CEO Sundar Pichai expressed “deep apology” after announcing 12,000 job cuts.

Environmentalists suspect toxins released by dredging to expand the port at Teesside, a heavy industrial area, may be to blame. Academic research supported by the fishing industry last year suggested that the industrial pollutant pyridine may be the underlying cause of the dredging of the Tees estuary.

But a panel of scientists and industry experts set up by the UK government said it had found no evidence that pollutants were to blame.

Read also | Coronation of King Charles III: From date to time and livestream details, here’s everything you need to know about the historic event.

The panel, chaired by the government’s chief scientific adviser for the environment, Gideon Henderson, said it was “unlikely” that pyridine or other toxic pollutants had caused the deaths.

“We just couldn’t find evidence of high concentrations of pyridine in coastal seawater,” said Crispin Halsall, an environmental chemist at Lancaster University who was involved in the report.

The team concluded that a new pathogen – an underlying disease or parasite – in UK waters was “likely” responsible for the crabs’ deaths. The scientists said they were unable to determine what pathogen, if any, was responsible.

“We’ve probably raised more questions than answers,” said Tammy Horton, a researcher at the UK’s National Oceanography Centre, who worked on the study.

She said it was “highly unlikely” that the crab’s pathogen had any impact on human health and that “seafood is safe to eat”. (Associated Press)

(This is an unedited and auto-generated story from a Syndicated News feed, the content body may not have been modified or edited by LatestLY staff)



[ad_2]

Source link

Related Articles

BRICS+ Set to Outpace G7 by 2026: A New Era of Economic Power and Global Influence

BRICS+ group, consisting of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, alongside a handful of newly integrated nations, is on the brink of a...

From Seed to Superfoods The Inspiring Journey of Bharat Budhiraja and Urbana Superfoods

In a world teeming with fast-paced food trends, Bharat Budhiraja is charting a unique path with his brand, Urbana Superfoods, owned by Krish Perennials Pvt....

U.S. Dollar Surges Amid Market Volatility: Fed Comments Spark Shifts in Euro and Yen as Economic Uncertainty Grows.

U.S. dollar is experiencing a significant surge as global currency markets react to recent developments, particularly comments from the U.S. Federal Reserve about potential...

UAE Amplifies Compassion: Humanitarian Aid to Gaza Reaches 121 Deliveries with ‘Operation Chivalrous Knight 3

UAE commitment to humanitarian aid has once again been highlighted through its ongoing support for the people of Gaza. In a significant effort to alleviate...

Cryosphere in Crisis: Urgent Call for Global Action as Rapid Ice Loss Threatens Economies and Ecosystems

Cryosphere, encompassing Earth's frozen water reserves—ice sheets, glaciers, sea ice, snow cover, and permafrost—is undergoing dramatic transformation due to accelerating global warming. Scientists are raising...

Latest Articles