[ad_1]
Employees at three Starbucks stores in the Buffalo area of New York have applied to join Workers United, an affiliate of the International Service Workers Union.
With the efforts of workers in Buffalo, New York to organize, Starbucks workers should not have the right to vote for the union on the basis of a coffee shop, the coffee chain told the U.S. Labor Council.
“Facts and laws do not support holding separate and separate elections,” Starbucks lawyer Alan Maud said at a hearing held by the National Labor Relations Committee on Thursday, which is responsible for overseeing labor union organizations in the United States.
The model believes that due to the similarities between stores, any labor vote should include employees from all 20 locations in the company’s Buffalo area-which means that the union needs the support of the majority of participating employees in the area to win.
His comments were made after employees of three Starbucks stores in the Buffalo area petitioned to join Workers United, an affiliate of the International Service Workers Union. The union has indicated that it will support other stores, but it is not currently seeking elections there. The event called itself the “Starbucks Workers’ Federation.”
Union lawyer Ian Hayes said via email that Starbucks’ regional voting proposal would “depart from decades of precedent.”
A labor committee official is listening to a debate about whether to vote individually or in a larger vote in each of the three stores. A larger group may disrupt the labor movement by flooding in elections with voters who have not been contacted by the union.
‘Presumed suitable’
In comments at the hearing on Wednesday, the hearing officer Thomas Miller stated that according to the precedent of the Labor Committee, a bargaining unit composed of employees in the same location is “presumed to be appropriate” and therefore Starbucks will have the responsibility to prove that the reason is This should not be the case in Buffalo.
“In general, unions prefer smaller units because it is easier to obtain and maintain support in smaller employee groups,” University of North Carolina law professor and former NLRB lawyer Jeffrey Hirsch said in an email Say. “For exactly the same reasons, employers prefer larger units.”
Mark Pierce said that in order to overcome the labor committee’s usual assumption that it is legal to elect only among employees in one location, the company adopted strategies such as “centralized control of labor relations” between different locations to prove greater A group of voters is more suitable. He is the Chairman of the NLRB under President Barack Obama.
“Employers may argue that a single site lacks local management autonomy to make key decisions, employees at multiple work sites have common daily supervision, and employee exchanges are frequent,” said Pierce, who now guides workers’ human rights research at Georgetown Law School Said in an email.
The company’s spokesperson Reggie Borges (Reggie Borges) said that Starbucks is promoting a market-wide vote because it wants to be inclusive. He said that workers often take over from different locations in the area, so the behavior of any store will affect other stores.
“For partners in this market, it is unfair to have no say in whether to join a union,” he said. He added that the company’s position was “consistent” with a letter sent by the Starbucks Workers’ Federation to Starbucks before applying for the election, stating that the union’s “organizing committee includes Starbucks partners from the Buffalo area”.
In recent months, New York State’s second largest city has been a hotbed of progressive radicalism. India’s Walton was the first candidate for mayor of a major socialist party in decades, and recently won the city’s Democratic primary election for mayor, making her an overwhelming advantage to win the post.
Together with Starbucks, a new high-profile labor movement was launched in non-union companies such as Amazon.com Inc. and Alphabet Inc. last year. Across the country, the Covid-19 pandemic has triggered activism among so-called basic workers, and President Joe Biden’s election has spurred a new push through reforms that will limit management strategies, such as mandatory town defense meetings. This has become the main body of the struggle in the United States.
[ad_2]
Source link