A man has a sexually transmitted disease in a car, and the woman sues GEICO for compensation of US$1 million

After a woman in Missouri participated in some adult activities and contracted a venereal disease from a man in the back seat of a car, she asked GEICO for $1 million. The man was insured by his insurance company.

Daily mail According to reports, GEICO subsequently filed a counterclaim in the Federal Court, accusing the men and women who chose to remain anonymous during the court proceedings to collude in order to obtain a huge payday.

The insurance company now challenges the right granted by the court to remain anonymous to continue the case. This woman was only referred to as MO in court documents. After she had unprotected sex with a man named MB in 2017, she filed a liability lawsuit against this popular institution. Hyundai Genesis in the back seat.

As a result, the woman claimed that her HPV test was positive.

The car is insured in the name of the man. At that time, the woman had legal negotiations with the man without GEICO’s knowledge and reached an agreement in the state court. She would receive $5.2 million. According to the court, she “can only collect from GEICO if there is one. “document.

Since then, the woman filed a claim with GEICO for a claim of US$1 million, but there is a dispute. Now she threatens to sue for damages related to her 2018 diagnosis. The case has been upgraded to a federal affair.

The couple admitted that they did not use protective measures when intervening across the state borders of eastern Kansas, but the woman believed that GEICO owed her compensation because the car was insured in the name of the man.

GEICO requested that the case be dismissed on the grounds that the man’s car insurance only covers injuries caused by “owning, maintaining or using” the car.

There are also questions about why the couple chose to stay private when they had public sex in the car, and considering whether the couple admitted to having a relationship elsewhere at the time, whether they contracted the virus during the hookup.

Due to the lack of personal jurisdiction, the court allowed the defendant to “hear anonymously before the court makes a ruling on the MO’s motion to dismiss”; The defendant’s complaint.

The judge has not yet ruled on this case.