[ad_1]
Two Indian-Americans — Congressmen Ro Khanna and Vijaya Gadde — The Laptop Story of US President Joe Biden’s Son Hunter Biden The full disclosure announced by Twitter CEO Elon Musk will be published on the microblogging website.
Elon Musk, the richest man in the world who bought Twitter last monthsaid on Friday he would release details of what he called Twitter’s “suppression” of a controversial New York Post report about Hunter Biden’s laptop ahead of the 2020 U.S. election.
He also tweeted that it would be “fantastic” and that there would be a “live Q&A” on the topic.
Read also | Twitter offers advertisers incentives after many marketers leave platform: report
The story purports to contain emails retrieved from Hunter’s laptop. The New York Post said it learned of the existence of the emails from Trump’s former chief White House strategist, Steve Bannon, and from Rudy Giuliani, Trump’s personal lawyer at the time. Got these emails.
Twitter initially limited the story’s spread, citing concerns it could be the result of a foreign country disinformation campaignBut the social media company quickly walked back its response, with then-CEO Jack Dorsey calling the decision to block the link “unacceptable.”
Read also | France’s Macron criticizes Elon Musk for loosening Twitter content rules
Khanna is a Democrat who represents Silicon Valley in the U.S. House of Representatives, while Gard, an attorney, was Twitter’s general counsel and director of legal, policy and trusts before being fired by new boss and CEO Musk.
Writer Matt Taibbi published a series of tweets, as well as Twitter internal communications, about allegations that the social media platform suppressed news and information related to Hunter’s laptop during the 2020 election cycle.
According to information posted by Taibbi, Khanna appears to have challenged Twitter’s decision to restrict access to the New York Post investigative report on Hunter’s laptop.
“Ro Khanna is awesome,” Musk said in a tweet as the information started pouring in. Khanna objected to Twitter’s alleged censorship in a confidential email to Gadde.
“I say this entirely on Biden’s partisanship and believe he has done nothing wrong. But now the story is more about censorship than relatively innocuous emails, and it’s becoming more important than ever ,” Khanna wrote to Gadde.
“In the heat of a presidential campaign, limiting the distribution of newspaper articles (even if the New York Post is most correct) seems to generate more opposition than good,” Khanna wrote Gard, asking her not to Share this article with their email.
Khanna said Twitter’s move appeared to violate the principles of the First Amendment.
“If classified information or other information is hacked, it may reveal serious war crimes, and the New York Times publishes it, I think the New York Times should have this right. Journalists should not be held accountable for the illegal actions of their sources unless they actively Assist in the hacking,” Khanna said.
In response to Khanna’s email, Gadde defended Twitter’s policy and its decision on the Post’s story.
“We sent out a clear tweet threat earlier this evening to explain our policy on posting private information and direct links to hacked material,” she wrote.
“The press secretary’s account has not been permanently suspended — we are asking her to delete tweets containing material that violates our rules, and her account will be restricted until she complies,” Gard wrote to Khanna.
Some of the earliest tools to control speech were designed to fight spammers and financial fraudsters, Taibi writes.
“Slowly, over time, Twitter employees and executives began to find more and more uses for these tools. Outsiders also began to petition the company to manipulate speech: a little at first, then more often, then constantly,” says Taibi wrote.
“In 2020, it’s become commonplace for those involved to ask to delete tweets. One executive will write to another: ‘The Biden team has more to review.’ The reply will come back: ‘Processed,’” he said. pointed out.
According to Taibbi, the tools are available to both parties.
In 2020, for example, the demands of both the Trump White House and the Biden campaign have been met. However, the system is not balanced, he wrote.
“It’s based on contacts. Because Twitter was and still is made up of people with a political leaning, there are more channels, more ways to complain, open to the left (well, Democrats) than to the right ,” he said in one of the articles. tweets.
“The skewing of content moderation decisions can be seen in the document you’re about to read. However, it was also an assessment of multiple current and former senior executives,” Taibi said.
[ad_2]
Source link