18 C
Dubai
Friday, January 3, 2025
spot_img

San Francisco’s In-N-Out Burger closed and reopened after employees failed to check the customer’s vaccination certificate

[ad_1]

In-N-Out Burger and the City of San Francisco appear to be arguing over the authorization of the Covid-19 vaccine.According to CBS in San Francisco, the burger shop is Temporarily closed last Thursday Because its employees did not check the vaccination certificate for the customer. Although the business has reopened, it is now limited to takeaway.

For those who don’t know, this In-N-Out location is located in a tourist area called Fisherman’s Wharf. It usually welcomes guests to dine and take out indoors, and there is no drive.

However, the San Francisco Department of Public Health (SFDPH) temporarily shut down operations because store employees did not perform the city-wide mission known as “A Safe Return to Health Order.”

The order requires all restaurant employees to “actively intervene, requiring each customer to provide proof of vaccination and photo identification, and then, as a law enforcement officer, prohibit any customer without proper documentation from entering.”

Therefore, Hamburg Union received the final notice of violation and the notice of closure due to violation on October 14. Obviously, due to the complaint, the health department reminded In-N-Out representatives that they needed a vaccination certificate after they visited the restaurant on September 24. In another visit on October 6, In-N-Out still violated the rules.

Despite the temporary closure, In-N-Out continues to support their decision to provide services to all restaurant employees and “make everyone feel at home”.

“We refuse to be the vaccination police of any government. It is unreasonable, intrusive and unreasonable to force our restaurant employees to classify customers into those who can receive services and those who cannot, based on the documents they carry or for any other reason. Safe,” the statement read. “We strongly oppose any government regulations that force private companies to discriminate against customers who choose to patronize their business. This is obviously excessive government intervention, which is intrusive, inappropriate, and offensive.”

Want to update directly in your text inbox?Contact us at 917-722-8057 or Click here to join!



[ad_2]

Source link

Related Articles

Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt’s Tumultuous Journey Ends: Divorce Finalized After Eight Turbulent Years

Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt have finalized their divorce, officially closing a chapter in one of Hollywood’s most high-profile relationships. Angelina Jolie, often referred to...

Argentina Dominates FIFA Rankings: World Champions Hold Top Spot for Second Year Running

Argentina dominance in the world of football continues as the reigning FIFA World Cup champions hold the number one position in the FIFA rankings...

UAE Sparkles with Unforgettable Year-End Festivities: Fireworks, Concerts, and Cultural Extravaganza Await.

UAE Sparkles with Unforgettable Year-End Festivities: Fireworks, Concerts, and Cultural Extravaganza Await As the year draws to a close, the UAE is gearing up to...

Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sanchez Shut Down $600M Aspen Wedding Rumors: ‘Completely False’

Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sanchez have strongly refuted a recent report claiming they are planning a lavish $600 million wedding in Aspen. The Jeff Bezos...

UAE Team Emirates Accelerates to New Heights: Landmark Sponsorship with XRG Fuels Future Success

UAE Team Emirates cycling team, renowned for its achievements on the global stage, has announced a groundbreaking six-year sponsorship agreement with the Emirati energy...

Latest Articles