U.S. and Saudi Arabia Forge Ahead with Civil Nuclear Deal
The United States and Saudi Arabia are edging closer to reaching a preliminary agreement on civil nuclear cooperation, marking a potentially significant step in their long-standing diplomatic and economic relationship. This anticipated collaboration is designed to support the development of Saudi Arabia’s civil nuclear program, and a formal memorandum of understanding is expected to be signed later in the year. Although both nations have expressed a strong commitment to advancing this cooperation, key discussions are ongoing, particularly concerning non-proliferation safeguards, which remain a central and sensitive aspect of the agreement.
At the heart of the proposed partnership is Saudi Arabia’s ambition to diversify its energy sources and reduce its dependence on fossil fuels. The Kingdom, one of the world’s leading oil producers, has made clear its desire to transition to a more sustainable energy mix as part of its Vision 2030 initiative—a comprehensive plan aimed at economic diversification and modernization. U.S. Civil nuclear energy is seen as a crucial component of this transformation, offering a clean, stable, and efficient alternative to oil and gas. The United States, with its advanced nuclear technology and experience, is viewed as a natural partner to help the Kingdom achieve these goals.
American involvement in Saudi Arabia’s nuclear program is also strategic from a geopolitical standpoint. By engaging with Riyadh on civil nuclear energy, the United States aims to counter the growing influence of rival powers—particularly China and Russia—who have been increasingly active in the global nuclear energy market. Washington is eager to ensure that any nuclear development in the region adheres to international norms and safeguards, and that its allies remain closely aligned with U.S. standards and oversight.
Nonetheless, the path toward a formal U.S. agreement has been anything but straightforward. A major point of contention lies in the realm of non-proliferation. The United States has consistently emphasized the importance of strict safeguards to prevent the misuse of nuclear technology for weapons development. Saudi Arabia, on the other hand, has maintained that it seeks only peaceful uses for nuclear energy but has shown reluctance to accept certain restrictions that would go beyond the basic requirements of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
One of the key issues is the so-called “123 Agreement,” named after Section 123 of the U.S. Atomic Energy Act, which sets the terms for nuclear cooperation with foreign nations. These agreements typically require the recipient country to commit to not enriching uranium or reprocessing spent fuel—two technologies that could potentially be used to develop nuclear weapons. While the United Arab Emirates signed such an agreement in 2009, agreeing to a “gold standard” of non-proliferation by foregoing enrichment and reprocessing, Saudi Arabia has been hesitant to make a similar commitment.
Saudi officials have argued that they should not be held to a higher standard than other nations and have suggested that retaining the option to enrich uranium is a matter of national sovereignty. Some within the Kingdom have also expressed concerns about regional security, especially in light of Iran’s nuclear activities. They argue that Saudi Arabia must maintain the flexibility to respond to regional threats, which complicates the negotiations with the U.S.
American lawmakers have raised concerns about entering into a nuclear agreement with Saudi Arabia without strong non-proliferation commitments. Several members of Congress have pointed to the Kingdom’s past statements about pursuing nuclear capabilities if Iran were to develop a nuclear weapon. This, they argue, could spark a regional arms race, undermining decades of non-proliferation efforts in the Middle East. Any proposed agreement would ultimately require congressional approval, and bipartisan support is far from guaranteed unless robust safeguards are included.
Despite these hurdles, both sides have signaled a willingness to continue negotiations and work toward a compromise. For Saudi Arabia, the prospect of acquiring U.S. , American nuclear technology and expertise is highly appealing, not only for its practical benefits but also for the prestige and legitimacy it brings. For the United States, engaging with Saudi Arabia on nuclear energy offers a way to shape the Kingdom’s program from the outset, ensuring it remains peaceful and compliant with international standards.
Stay up to date with every latest news-click here