[ad_1]
You may have to be cautious when reading this story, roommate, because it may turn your stomach!As We reported before, Since it was discovered that sandwich chains might not serve real tuna sandwiches, Subway has been affected a bit.
A study published by The New York Times showed that no trace of tuna was found in Subway’s tuna sandwiches, but laboratory experts have not been able to fully determine the ingredients in the fish mixture until now.according to Reuters, The new version of the lawsuit alleging Subway used tuna to deceive the public says the sandwich contains chicken, pork, and beef.
The latest lawsuit filed by Karen Dhanowa and Nilima Amin is the third version of the proposed class action, which Subway calls “reckless and inappropriate.” Since the lawsuit was filed in January, Subway has launched a website to defend its tuna and improve its menu.
Subway representatives said that the new lawsuit misled the public.
“The plaintiff’s recent attempt to file a claim against Subway is as meatless as their previous attempts,” said Mark C. Goodman, an agent of Subway. “These statements are wrong. If the case passes the litigation stage, it will prove to be completely meatless.”
In a statement to the Washington Post, a Subway spokesperson stated that their tuna is “high-quality, wild-caught, 100% tuna…In fact, Subway tuna is real. And it is strictly regulated by the US FDA and other government departments. Entities around the world.”
Subway is working hard to get the lawsuit dismissed.
Want to update directly in your text inbox?Contact us at 917-722-8057 or https://my.community.com/theshaderoom
[ad_2]
Source link