[ad_1]
At least 24 British police officers in England and Wales have admitted to using surveillance camera equipment made by Chinese companies including Huawei, Dahua, Hikvision, Novo and Honeywell that has raised security or ethical concerns. EPA-EFE/STR file photo
A Chinese technician installs one of several new CCTV cameras in central Beijing. A new government report released on Wednesday looked into Chinese-made camera technology used by Britain’s police, defense ministry and other parts of the country, finding the system was rife with equipment supplied by Chinese companies and posed a security risk.File photo of Stephen Shaver/UPI
A drone is tethered to a building ahead of the upcoming inauguration of President Joe Biden. At least 23 police officers in the UK use cameras mounted on drones made by Chinese manufacturer DJI to record video, audio, thermal imaging and night vision missions.File photo by Ken Cedeno/UPI
February 15 (United Press International) — The surveillance equipment Britain relies on for its security is rife with camera technology from Chinese companies that have been flagged as national security risks because of ties to the ruling Communist Party or other ethical concerns.
one Audit of Public Surveillance Cameras Helicopters, drones, body cameras and number plate recognition systems used in 43 police districts in England and Wales found troops were “punctured” by Chinese-made equipment.
advertise
Biometrics and Surveillance Camera Commissioner Fraser Sampson released the report on Wednesday calling for a ban on equipment made by Chinese companies deemed to be a security risk.
The report by the BSC office, which oversees the industry, has also raised concerns from the Civilian Nuclear Police, the Ministry of Defense and the Traffic Police.
At least 24 agencies have admitted that their exterior and interior camera systems use equipment from Dahua, Hikvision, Honeywell, Huawei or Novo — companies that have had ongoing security concerns.
Another 23 said they operated drones or unmanned aerial vehicles with video, audio, thermal imaging and night vision capabilities, and that DJI, a Chinese manufacturer, blacklisted Published by the US Department of Defense in November.
Sampson said the country’s police forces and agencies are aware of the security concerns that cameras pose.
“There’s been a lot in the news the last few days about how we should be concerned about Chinese spy balloons at 60,000 feet. I don’t understand why we don’t at least care about Chinese cameras 6 feet above our heads on the street and elsewhere,” Sampson said.
While acknowledging that police officers must sometimes be able to use intrusive surveillance technology in public spaces, Sampson said that in order to maintain public trust, they must be able to convince people that their work partners and providers can be trusted.
“For some time now, myself and others have been saying that we should really be asking ourselves, for safety and ethical reasons, whether it’s appropriate for public institutions to use equipment made by companies that hang in the balance,” he added.
The report is in american shot down A giant high-altitude Chinese surveillance balloon has left the coast of South Carolina after drifting across the country.
U.S. fighter jets shot down three more unidentified objects over Alaska, Canada and Lake Huron on Friday, Saturday and Sunday.
Last week, Australian Defense Minister Richard Marles announced planRemove the camera made in China From government buildings for security reasons.
The cameras, made by Chinese companies Hikvision and Dahua, were removed after an audit by Australia’s shadow minister for cyber security, James Paterson, found at least 913 cameras installed in 250 government buildings, Marles said. Will be removed from government buildings.
[ad_2]
Source link