[ad_1]
from revolving door keeps spinning department
I have to admit I forgot the whole White House IP czar position.Officially, the “Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator” or IPEC, the position created by the Protect Intellectual Property Act of 2008, we warn that the whole thing is an attempt to turn the White House into Hollywood’s Private Copyright Police Force. The first IPEC didn’t come until after President Obama was elected, and while he was in office, there were two IPECs who served under him, with somewhat mixed results. The first one, got bad startbut is willing to listen to non-minimalist opinions, and eventually produces some more balanced reports About “Intellectual Property Enforcement”.
His second tsar began his career with a dreadful speech, abusing a bunch of statistics to imply that “intellectual property law” was directly responsible For anything “protected” by these laws.
But… after that… nothing happened? I don’t know if Trump has IPEC. And, apparently, that’s not Biden’s top priority. Reports required by IPEC in 2022 released, but it came from “the IPEC office”, and as far as I know, no one was really IPEC at the time. Even if some copyright maximization lobbyists will openly complain about how Biden needs to nominate someone for the job, he’s only doing it now. Not surprisingly, but disappointingly, he pulled a man directly Outside of Hollywood, there continues to be an unfortunate revolving door between the traditional entertainment industry and the U.S. government when it comes to the role of copyright policy.
Remember, under the Constitution, copyright law must benefit the public. The monopoly granted by copyright is only a means to benefit the public, not an end in itself. Sadly, too many people in Hollywood believe that copyright and the gatekeepers who control it are all that matters and should be the primary beneficiaries. They usually care little about whether they benefit the public.this it does not mean Anyone in Hollywood would automatically support copyright maximalism — I’ve seen enough people from these companies who are more open-minded — but it’s bound to raise a level of skepticism.
The bios of Biden’s picks do not, in the least, suggest anyone willing to acknowledge and support the important role of fair use and the public domain in fostering creativity and innovation:
Deborah Robinson is an attorney with extensive experience protecting intellectual property worldwide. Her career has included leadership roles as a corporate attorney and public service as a prosecutor. Head of Intellectual Property Enforcement for Paramount Global (formerly ViacomCBS), Robinson has developed and implemented anti-piracy protocols to protect the property of music, television, digital and consumer products. She established the Global Content Protection Team, gathered evidence for criminal proceedings and directed civil litigation matters. She also regularly coordinates with social media and app platforms to create dedicated law enforcement workflows and builds alliances across multiple industry associations and industry alliances.
Before joining Paramount Global, Robinson spent five years at the Recording Industry Association of America protecting the rights of music creators He also served as an Assistant District Attorney of Philadelphia for seven years.
In general, this is not the resume of someone trying to protect the rights of the public. This is the guy who protects the company’s profits from actual artists and the public.
But, who knows, maybe she’ll surprise us all. But I’m not holding my breath.
Filed under: copyright, copyright enforcement, Deborah Robinson, law enforcement, Intellectual Property Czar, IPEC, joe biden, revolving door
company: the most important, riaa
[ad_2]
Source link