[ad_1]
In a series of interesting developments over the past six years, the topic of UFOs and extraterrestrial phenomena has taken center stage in the United States.
{{^userSubscribed}} {{/userSubscribed}}
{{^userSubscribed}} {{/userSubscribed}}
It all started in 2017, when The New York Times broke the news that former Senator Harry Reid had discreetly set aside $22 million in defense funding to investigate unknown foreign objects. Since then, many Navy pilots have reported frequent sightings of UFOs, prompting the Pentagon to revamp its investigative procedures to take the matter more seriously.
Despite heightened scrutiny, those investigations have yet to yield any major breakthroughs, and many of the objects seen by the pilots have turned out to be nothing more than balloons.
However, Leslie Kean and Ralph Blumenthal, who were part of the team that broke the New York Times story in 2017, have a recent report for those who believe in extraterrestrials. People whose lives exist bring hope.
{{^userSubscribed}} {{/userSubscribed}}
{{^userSubscribed}} {{/userSubscribed}}
Published on science On the Debrief website, the report debunks the claims of a Defense Intelligence whistleblower who claims the intelligence community is withholding classified evidence of “complete and partially complete craft of non-human origin.”
Whistleblower David Charles Grusch filed a complaint alleging that the Pentagon, along with other countries and defense contractors, retrieved “exotic origins (non-human intelligence, whether alien or of unknown origin), material science testing, and the presence of unique atomic arrangements and radiological signatures.
Grusch further claimed that recovered materials included complete and partially complete vehicles.
What sets Grusch apart from previous UFO experts discredited by skeptics is his credible background.A 36-year-old military veteran AfghanistanGrusch serves as a member of the Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon Task Force – an Office of Naval Intelligence program dedicated to investigating UFO sightings.
{{^userSubscribed}} {{/userSubscribed}}
{{^userSubscribed}} {{/userSubscribed}}
From 2019 to 2021, the whistleblower joined the task force on behalf of the National Reconnaissance Office, one of America’s leading intelligence agencies. His colleagues thought highly of him, and another member of the UFO task force, retired Army Colonel Karl Nell, called Grusch “beyond reproach.”
Nell even corroborated a claim in Grusch’s complaint that there was a competition among nations to “determine the [UFO] Crash/land and retrieve materials for exploitation/reverse engineering. “
Nell affirms that “his assertion that the ground-based arms race that has taken place in the sub-rosa for the past 80 years is largely based on reverse-engineered technology from unknown sources is fundamentally correct. The indisputable knowledge is that at least one Some technologies of unknown origin are derived from non-human intelligence.” Jonathan Gray, another intelligence officer who investigates UFOs, echoed the sentiment, asserting that “the phenomenon of non-human intelligence is real” and that “we are not alone. “. He emphasized that this is a global phenomenon, but global solutions are still eluding humanity.
{{^userSubscribed}} {{/userSubscribed}}
{{^userSubscribed}} {{/userSubscribed}}
Read also| | Lululemon’s ‘zero tolerance policy’ sparks backlash, employee fired for robbery
The debriefing obtained an unclassified version of Grusch’s complaint, which showed that the intelligence community deliberately withheld evidence of congressional oversight of alien technology, effectively blocking legitimate scrutiny of the UAP (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena) program. When Grusch raised concerns, he faced months of retaliation.
To protect the integrity of the ongoing investigation, the report did not disclose specific details of the retaliation. However, an intelligence investigation has been launched in response to the whistleblower’s complaint. While the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence declined to comment, the Pentagon confirmed information provided in the April report. Grusch, who retired in April, said he hoped his claims would deliver an “ontological shock.”
{{^userSubscribed}} {{/userSubscribed}}
{{^userSubscribed}} {{/userSubscribed}}
Here’s an exclusive interview with Grusch that aired Monday:
[ad_2]
Source link