[ad_1]
Naming diseases is a complex job. To be useful, a name must be unique, descriptive, and memorable so that it can be easily referenced, especially when a medical situation becomes urgent. While the easiest way to name diseases may just be to number them, the system becomes very difficult to refer to effectively when time is of the essence.
It seems intuitive to name diseases by their origin or where they are found; however, there are problems with this approach. As our world becomes more of a global citizen, diseases and their names can spread across cultures, so it is imperative to be sensitive and inclusive to all who may encounter them.
Given the recent conversation about disease naming, stacker Investigating how “monkeypox” and other disease names have become controversial by gathering news, science, and government sources. While this isn’t an all-encompassing list of issues with disease naming, it explores several worrisome ways through which diseases are named, shorthand for public discourse.
You may also like: Fastest-warming state since 1970
[ad_2]
Source link