[ad_1]
The decision of the International Court of Justice has largely helped Somalia set a maritime boundary believed to be rich in oil and gas.
The United Nations Supreme Court has granted Somalia control over most of the potentially rich oil and gas resources of the Indian Ocean. Fierce lawsuit On the maritime border with neighboring Kenya.
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruled on Tuesday that there was “no agreed maritime boundary” and a new border was drawn near the claimed border in Somalia, although Kenya retained part of 100,000 square kilometers (39,000 square miles). ) District, Chief Justice Joan Donoghue (Joan Donoghue) said.
The ruling is legally binding, but the court has no enforcement power.
The court rejected Kenya’s claim of the maritime boundary it sought, saying Kenya had not consistently maintained it.
But after the country claimed that some maritime activities in Kenya violated its sovereignty, the court rejected Somalia’s claim for compensation.
Kenya said last week that it Won’t recognize The court’s decision stated that there was “obvious and inherent prejudice” in the judicial process.
The statement acknowledged that the judgment will “have a profound impact on the security, politics, society and economy of the region and other regions”, while urging Kenyans to remain calm.
Somalia filed a lawsuit with the International Court of Justice on the maritime boundary between the two countries in 2014, which caused tensions between the two countries.
The court in The Hague stated that it “cannot ignore the background of the civil war”, which has destabilized Somalia for years and restricted its government functions. It also found that “there is no convincing evidence that Somalia has acquiesced” to Kenya’s claims of maritime borders along parallel latitudes.
Al Jazeera’s Malcolm Weber reported in Nairobi, Kenya, “The new maritime border designated by the court will assign most of the disputed territory to Somalia and a small part to Kenya.
“The court has stated that Kenya has no legal basis to reject this judgment because it signed the court’s authorization in the 1960s and cannot retroactively deny this,” Weber said.
“The question now is whether Kenya will accept this ruling. If it does not, Somalia will be in a better position to seek support from the United Nations and diplomatic support to enforce or force Kenya to uphold this ruling.”
[ad_2]
Source link