WORLD NEWS | Pakistan G20 outbreak hoax: report

Islamabad [Pakistan]April 19 (ANI): Pakistan, which is not a member of the G20, raised objections to India hosting a G20 event in Srinagar, Kashmir, after India published its full calendar of G20 events, Pakistan Military Observer reported.

Srinagar will host the third meeting of the G20 Tourism Working Group during India’s G20 presidency from May 22 to 24. After the G20 Bali summit ended in December last year, Indonesia handed over the baton of the G20 annual rotating presidency to India.

Read also | London: An 86-year-old British Sikh woman has been released after 15 years in prison for an “honour killing” by her daughter-in-law.

India has released its full calendar of events leading up to the summit on April 7, 2023. The calendar features G20 and Youth-20 meetings in Srinagar, Kashmir and Leh in the regions around Ladakh in April and May.

These fixtures are created after thorough discussion and approval with member participants. International conferences require a great deal of planning and consideration.

Read also | State of world population in 2023: India overtakes China to become world’s most populous country, UN report says.

Surprisingly, Pakistan, which is not a member of the G20, expressed its opposition to India hosting the G-20 event in Srinagar, Kashmir. What are its objections? Let’s try to separate these from a bunch of accusations and insinuations. First, Pakistan has no right to interfere in issues that are exclusively members of the G20, as it is not a member of the group, according to Pakistani military monitors.

In its statement, Pakistan said, “In June last year, the foreign ministry had warned G20 countries not to accept Delhi’s proposal to hold part of next year’s summit in Jammu and Kashmir in India, saying India was trying to legitimize its illegal activities. .to control disputed areas.”

Last June, Pakistan’s foreign ministry’s warning to the G20 turned into a mess. The G20 meeting did not take into account Pakistan’s “cautiousness” and proceeded as usual. The implication is that all of Pakistan’s requests to prevent India from hosting the G20 meeting in Kashmir were rejected. Therefore, the result of multiple objections must be the same.

Pakistan claimed that New Delhi’s decision to hold some meetings in Srinagar was “self-interested”.

In its statement, Pakistan’s foreign ministry said, “India’s irresponsible move is the latest in a series of selfish measures aimed at continuing the illegal occupation of Jammu and Kashmir in complete disregard of UN Security Council resolutions and in violation of the principles of the UN Charter and international law,” Pakistan Military Observer reported.

We must address two issues. Jammu and Kashmir is currently under “illegal occupation” by India. The second is “blatant defiance of UN Security Council resolutions.”

Let’s examine what was said in SC Resolution.

The SC Resolution of 21 April 1948 consisted of three parts. Briefly stated, Part One first imposed on Pakistan the following obligations: (a) Pakistan’s commitment to ensure the withdrawal of tribal members and Pakistani nationals from J&K, and (b) to prevent and stop any invasion of the state. The obligations imposed on India were: (a) conditional on the withdrawal of troops by the Commission to the satisfaction of the Commission of the withdrawal of Pakistani nationals and tribal members and the entry into force of the ceasefire, and (b) a planned gradual reduction of troops until only the minimum required to enforce law and order remained.

The first part of the SC resolution referred to by Pakistan’s foreign ministry in its statement stipulates the first condition that Pakistan must meet. “Safe evacuation of tribal members and Pakistani nationals.”

This obligation breeds two important logical conclusions. The first is that Pakistani tribal members and nationals have entered Kashmir and are still there. The second conclusion is that Kashmir was invaded and Pakistan had to withdraw its troops.

Has Pakistan withdrawn its citizens and tribal people from Kashmir? Let the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Pakistan respond. In order to fight the Indian army, Pakistan has sent numerous well-equipped regular army battalions. Who ignored the Security Council resolution of 21 April 1948? Pakistan’s false claim that it did not support the invasion of Kashmir on 22 October 1947 was debunked by the relevant resolution.

The Pakistani Foreign Minister notified the United Nations India-Pakistan Commission (UNCIP) upon his arrival in Karachi on 7th July 1948 that the Pakistani Army at that time had 3 regular brigades in Kashmir which were in the first half of May 1948.

“This disclosure by Pakistan has changed the entire face of the Kashmir issue,” said committee member Joseph Kerber.

On June 5, 1968, Nehru wrote to the SC chairman stating that the committee would not proceed with the resolution until the objections raised by the Indian government were satisfactorily resolved, Pakistan’s military monitor said.

The Security Council Resolution of 21 April 1948 is no longer valid as Pakistan willfully violated its spirit and refused to implement it. Former UN Secretary-General Boutros Ghali and Kofi Annan stated that after India and Pakistan signed the “Simla Agreement”, the UN will no longer intervene in the Kashmir issue. Even in 1995, Boutros Ghali wanted to remove the Kashmir issue from the UN agenda, and his successor Kofi Annan said that the Chapter VI resolution adopted fifty years ago “Unable to execute”.

When the relationship between the United States and Pakistan was at its best in 2002, the then U.S. Assistant Secretary of State admitted again in testimony before the International Relations Subcommittee of the U.S. House of Representatives, “In the eyes of the United States, the Simla agreement has replaced the UN resolution on Kashmir in the 1940s.”

Pakistan’s foreign ministry continues to believe that exchanging lies and rumors will help it make progress on the Kashmir issue. India has repeatedly reiterated its readiness and ability to reclaim parts of Johnson & Johnson state that are still under illegal Pakistani control. Moreover, India cannot shirk its moral obligation to protect the people of Pakistan-occupied Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan, who have long begged the Indian Prime Minister to liberate them from the bloodthirsty Pakistani colonialists.

Why is Pakistan beating its chest for Kashmir? The answer is really simple. The only life buoy left by Pakistan to prevent shipwreck is a Kashmiri tantrum. However, the lifebuoy is also leaking. Alas! According to Pakistan Military Monitor, Pakistan did not read the writing on the wall. (Arnie)

(This is an unedited and auto-generated story from a Syndicated News feed, the content body may not have been modified or edited by LatestLY staff)