Sandeep Reddy Vanga, known for his earlier works like Kabir Singh and Arjun Reddy, presents his latest creation, “Animal,” featuring Ranbir Kapoor. The film, as promised by its intriguing trailer, lives up to its anticipation and even surpasses expectations. However, the cinematic evaluation of “Animal” reveals a narrative that diverges sharply from conventional cinema.
Bold Claims and Questions:
- The article begins by posing fundamental questions about the film’s entertainment value, style, and inventiveness, all of which receive affirmative answers.
- Acknowledging the film’s impressive performances, adrenaline-pumping background music, and intense violence, the writer raises questions about its treatment of women, drawing parallels to Sandeep Reddy Vanga’s previous work, Kabir Singh.
Assessment of “Animal”:
- The evaluation asserts that “Animal” delivers on its promise of pushing boundaries and venturing into the dark, cyclic nature of violence. It is described as a film that demands attention throughout its lengthy runtime.
- The article recognizes the film’s departure from conventional cinematic virtues, plot structures, and storylines, defining it more as a personal statement than traditional cinema.
- The narrative asserts that the film’s purpose is to offend and provoke, challenging societal norms and norms of artistic expression.
- A brief overview of the storyline introduces Ranvijay Balbir Singh (Ranbir Kapoor) as a problematic character with father issues. The narrative explores the transformation of this character into a violent adult seeking his father’s attention.
Film’s Evolution and Downfall:
- The initial 1.5 hours are praised for their non-linear narrative, tension between father and son, and the looming threat of violence. However, the article suggests that the film loses its grip as it progresses, particularly after an assassination attempt.
- The cinematic critique argues that “Animal” fails as cinema, primarily because it becomes a vehicle for expressing Sandeep Reddy Vanga’s anger and commitment to showcasing violence, rather than a nuanced exploration of characters and their complexities.
Ranbir Kapoor’s Performance:
- Ranbir Kapoor’s performance is highlighted as a standout element, with the actor fully embracing the complexity and insanity of his character. Other cast members, including Anil Kapoor and Bobby Deol, are criticized for underdeveloped roles.
Treatment of Women:
- The article strongly condemns the film’s treatment of women, describing it as an extreme celebration of toxic masculinity designed for shock value rather than narrative progression. Actresses Rashmika Mandana and Tripti Dimri are noted, but their roles are seen as secondary to servicing the male leads.
- A surprising positive note is found in the film’s portrayal of men as disgraced, dehumanized, and toxic. The article suggests that, contrary to its posturing of alpha male dominance, “Animal” does a disservice to men more than women.
- The article concludes with a verdict that recognizes the film’s important message: it guides women on the kind of men to avoid and advises men on the qualities they should never embody. Parents are also cautioned against raising a child like Ranvijay or Kabir Singh.
- The final remarks encourage anyone with doubts to watch a Sandeep Reddy Vanga film, highlighting the director’s consistent penchant for controversial and thought-provoking narratives.